Every month, Wikipedia hits you with that guilt-trip banner: “Send us $2.75 to keep knowledge free.” No, screw them. As Joan Crawford said to Christina, “Not a cent.”
Sounds like a noble gesture, you know, when an online encyclopedia needs a hand out, and you’re the only one who can help? In this case, no. Wikipedia is a leftist echo chamber, rigged to push progressive narratives while silencing dissent. Your donation props up a machine that twists facts to favor the left.
The bias is blatant. Wikipedia slants pro-Democrat, attaching negative words like “anger” and “disgust” to right-wing figures while linking “joy” to leftists. Early U.S. politics pages leaned Democratic, using liberal-favored terms like “civil rights” far more than Republican ones like “war on terror.”
Compared to Britannica, Wikipedia skews further left.
Global issues—global warming, Roe v. Wade—read like Democratic talking points.
The real scam? Locked pages. Wikipedia “protects” controversial bios and topics from “vandalism,” but it’s code for freezing leftist spins in place. Only vetted admins—often left-leaning—can touch them, blocking conservative edits. Switch to a right-wing party, and sentiment tanks. COVID origins? Lab-leak evidence gets buried under “consensus” locks. Left sources dominate citations, and right-leaning editors get sanctioned six times more.
This isn’t education; it’s indoctrination. Wikipedia trains AIs, spreading the bias further. Skip the donation. Let the simpletons fund their own propaganda. Seek truth elsewhere—before the locks spread.
